Innovative Mathematics Pedagogy: Evidence-Based Strategies for Enhancing Student Learning

Authors

  • Wing Cheung Tang Panel Head of Mathematics, Lock Tao Secondary School, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64229/2q2ck886

Keywords:

Mathematics Pedagogy, Inquiry-Based Learning, Mathematics Anxiety, Formative Assessment, STEM Education

Abstract

Modern trends in mathematics education are characterized by a move away from the conventional, teacher-centered pedagogy to dynamic, student-centered classrooms. This revolution is characterized by three main pillars: the adoption of pedagogies placing students as active investigators, the strategic integration of technology to provide personalized learning, and the application of psychological principles to counter math anxiety. This review examines the efficacy of contemporary approaches such as inquiry-based learning (IBL), gamification, and culturally responsive pedagogy, with the aid of ongoing formative assessment. Synthesised studies by leading researchers and guidelines by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics validate that these methods overall encourage critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and deep-seated conceptual understanding. Adaptive learning technology provides tailored support, whereas collaborative, inquiry-based activities build critical communication skills. Furthermore, interventions aimed at creating a growth mindset and reducing anxiety have been found to greatly improve the confidence and motivation of students. The findings are demanding a drastic shift in teachers' preparation and curriculum design. Teachers' professional growth should be oriented toward these new methods to meet the needs of the 21st century so that classrooms can promote equity, flexibility, and deep conceptual knowledge rather than superficial procedural fluency.

References

[1]Boaler, J. (2022). Limitless Mind: Learn, Lead, and Live Without Barriers. HarperOne.

[2]Dweck, C. (2023). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success (Updated Edition). Random House.

[3]National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2023). Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

[4]Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2021). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning from theory to practice. Springer International Publishing.

[5]Caffrey, T. (2023). Imagination and Pedagogy: Reclaiming the Educational in Further Education (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds).

[6]Kusuma, J. W. (2021). Constructivism from philosophy to mathematics learning. International Journal of Economy, Education, and Enterpreneurship, 1(2), 104-111.

[7]Foster, C., & Mauzard, N. (2025). Unifying Perspectives: Gestalt and Piagetian Learning Theories in the 21st Century Classroom. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 6(1), 24-30.

[8]Lasmawan, I. W., & Budiarta, I. W. (2020). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development and the students’ progress in learning (A heutagogcal bibliographical review). Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(4), 545-552.

[9]Szulewski, A., Howes, D., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2021). From theory to practice: the application of cognitive load theory to the practice of medicine. Academic Medicine, 96(1), 24-30.

[10]Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? American psychologist, 75(9), 1269.

[11]Joseph, V., Sheikh, I., & Rajani, S. (2022). Inquiry based learning method of teaching in education: A literature review. Webology, 19(3), 799-813.

[12]Meulenbroeks, R., van Rijn, R., & Reijerkerk, M. (2024). Fostering secondary school science students’ intrinsic motivation by inquiry-based learning. Research in Science Education, 54(3), 339-358.

[13]Abdulrahim, N. A., & Orosco, M. J. (2020). Culturally responsive mathematics teaching: A research synthesis. The urban review, 52(1), 1-25.

[14]Maryboy, N. C. (2020). Process and relationship in indigenous astronomy: Connectivity of mother earth and father sky. International Journal of Applied Science and Sustainable Development, 2(2), 14-24.

[15]Khasawneh, E., Gosling, C., & Williams, B. (2021). What impact does maths anxiety have on university students? BMC psychology, 9(1), 37.

[16]Affandi, L. H., Jampel, I. N., Pujawan, I., Sri Mertasari, N. M., & Ratnaya, I. G. (2025). Psychometric properties of adapted mindset instruments: A comprehensive comparison. Pakistan Journal of Life & Social Sciences, 23(1), 3696-3710.

[17]Bonner, E. P. (2021). Practicing culturally responsive mathematics teaching. Mathematics teacher: Learning and teaching PK-12, 114(1), 6-15.

[18]Ching, D. A. (2020). Two cubed approach in a collaborative classroom and the enhanced algebra and social skills of college students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4920-4930.

[19]Cipora, K., Santos, F. H., Kucian, K., & Dowker, A. (2022). Mathematics anxiety—where are we and where shall we go? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1513(1), 10-20.

[20]Quek, F. Y., Majeed, N. M., Kothari, M., Lua, V. Y., Ong, H. S., & Hartanto, A. (2021). Brief mindfulness breathing exercises and working memory capacity: Findings from two experimental approaches. Brain Sciences, 11(2), 175.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-18

Issue

Section

Articles